Fair
72°FFairFull Forecast

Letter: Relying on coal is economically unfeasible

Published: Friday, June 13, 2014 3:11 p.m. CDT

To the Editor:

In a sluggish economic recovery, the EPA’s (Environmental Protection Agency) new carbon rules aimed at eliminating coal as an energy source are a welcomed relief.

According to a 2010 Harvard study, “Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal," published in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, the cumulative costs from pollutants associated with coal combustion add 27 cents to the cost of a kilowatt-hour of energy, costing the United States more than half a trillion dollars a year, far in excess of what coal contributes economically.

A 2011 study, “Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy," in the American Economic Review, states that the external costs of burning coal are 2.2 times more costly to the U.S. economy than any economic benefits derived from coal.

Coal is a 19th-century energy source, requiring massive subsidies for its existence, and burning coal for 40 percent of our energy is economically unfeasible.

Jim ArnebergHoffman Estates

Get breaking and town-specific news sent to your phone. Sign up for text alerts from the Suburban Life Media.

Watch Now

Player embeded on all SLM instances for analytics purposes.

iFLY brings skydiving indoors

More videos »
 

Reader Poll

When do you start back to school shopping?
In July
At the start of August
At the end of August
As needed

COOKIES:
ZONE:
LAT:
LNG:
CAT:
CHAN:
CITY: